The other day, there was a Supreme Court Justice at C-SPAN giving an interview. I felt completely bad for that member of the Supreme Court because they almost didn’t make any sense. Although they were semi-coherent, I am not convinced that they knew what they were talking about. Perhaps your helpers and interns are doing all the work, and they are just sticking to what they knew in the past and sticking to party lines. I have a problem with this. Why do you ask?
Well, I would like to explain it like this; We live in a very complex society, things are constantly changing, and although the principles of the law may be the same, it is very difficult for me to justify the wisdom of a senile person, or almost, to decide how my family and I will live. in the future. There should be some kind of intellectual test each year for the justices of the Supreme Court in the United States of America to continue their service. I know they are appointed for life, but I think we might need to change that. With a new law thus introduced in our country, would it be abused?
Yes, it could be. However, there is always that risk, I would say that we are all under the potential harm of being harmed, all citizens of the United States, if we are to continue this, keeping people alive with half-brain withered pharmaceuticals. That could be very harsh, and I know there was lobbying by one of the big retirement associations to prevent Florida from conducting driving tests on people over ninety. Therefore, they only renewed the driver’s licenses for these people. Unfortunately, it is killing people, causing accidents and it is not right.
We require continuing licensing education for real estate people, insurance brokers, financial planners, and all kinds of other professionals. We should do the same with the lawyers and justices of the Supreme Court. If members of the Supreme Court are exempt from this type of continuing education and licensing, something that measures their competence, then one might wonder if we are keeping these justices alive anyway for political reasons, until the next administration comes in to replace them. . No, I’m not pointing fingers, not yet.
Remember, I’m writing this article because I watched an interview with a member of the United States Supreme Court on C-SPAN, and I couldn’t believe the words that came out of his mouth or the barely coherent responses during the interview. I cannot imagine these people involved in a complex debate and dialogue deciding the future law that will determine the future of this great country. Consider all of this and think about it.
